burst

Anonymous said on 08.05., 09:11

Rubin, M. (2023). Questionable Metascience Practices. Journal of Trial and Error. https://journal.trialanderror.org/pub/questionable-metascience-practices/release/3

Anonymous said on 08.05., 09:11

Meehl, P. E. (1967). Theory-testing in psychology and physics: A methodological paradox. Philosophy of science, 34(2), 103-115. https://media.pluto.psy.uconn.edu/Meehl%201967.pdf

Anonymous said on 08.05., 09:12

Liberman, M. (2015). Reproducible research and the common task method. Simmons Foundation Lecture. https://www.simonsfoundation.org/event/reproducible-research-and-the-common-task-method/

Anonymous said on 25.05., 09:45

Feynman, R. P. (1974). Cargo cult science. https://calteches.library.caltech.edu/3043/1/CargoCult.pdf

Anonymous said on 13.07., 16:26

https://rpt-rl.netlify.app/

1 What is a theory? Fried, E. I. (2020). Theories and models: What they are, what they are for, and what they are about. Psychological Inquiry, 31(4), 336-344. https://doi.org/10.1080/1047840X.2020.1854011
2 Does psychology have a theory problem? Meehl, P. E. (1978). Theoretical Risks and Tabular Asterisks: Sir Karl, Sir Ronald, and the Slow Progress of Soft Psychology. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 1978, Vol. 46, 806-834. https://www3.nd.edu/~ghaeffel/Meehl(1978).pdf
3 Does psychology have a theory problem? Klein, S. B. (2014). What can recent replication failures tell us about the theoretical commitments of psychology?. Theory & Psychology, 24(3), 326-338. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354314529616
4 Does psychology have a theory problem? Scheel, A. M., Tiokhin, L., Isager, P. M., & Lakens, D. (2021). Why hypothesis testers should spend less time testing hypotheses. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 16(4), 744-755. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691620966795
5 How to improve psychological theory Borsboom, D., van der Maas, H. L., Dalege, J., Kievit, R. A., & Haig, B. D. (2021). Theory construction methodology: A practical framework for building theories in psychology. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 16(4), 756-766. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691620969647
6 How to improve psychological theory Guest, O., & Martin, A. E. (2021). How computational modeling can force theory building in psychological science. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 16(4), 789-802. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691620970585
7 How to improve psychological theory Maatman, F. O. (2021). Psychology's Theory Crisis, and Why Formal Modelling Cannot Solve It. https://psyarxiv.com/puqvs/
8 Taking steps to improve psychological theory Flake, J. K., & Fried, E. I. (2020). Measurement schmeasurement: Questionable measurement practices and how to avoid them. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 3(4), 456-465. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245920952393
9 Taking steps to improve psychological theory van Rooij, I., & Blokpoel, M. (2020). Formalizing verbal theories: A tutorial by dialogue. Social Psychology, 51(5), 285. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000428
10 Are we ready to test our theories? Oberauer, K., & Lewandowsky, S. (2019). Addressing the theory crisis in psychology. Psychonomic bulletin & review, 26(5), 1596-1618. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-019-01645-2

Anonymous said on 17.07., 13:48

Szollosi, A., & Donkin, C. (2021). Arrested theory development: The misguided distinction between exploratory and confirmatory research. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 16(4), 717-724.

Anonymous said on 18.07., 15:13

Muthukrishna, M., & Henrich, J. (2019). A problem in theory. Nature Human Behaviour, 3(3), 221-229.

Anonymous said on 28.07., 14:33

Using Large Language Models to Simulate Multiple Humans and Replicate Human Subject Studies
Gati Aher, Rosa I. Arriaga, Adam Tauman Kalai

https://arxiv.org/abs/2208.10264

Anonymous said on 19.10., 09:22

Same data, different analysts: variation in effect sizes due to analytical decisions in ecology and evolutionary biology
Gould E, Fraser H, Parker T, Nakagawa S, Griffith S, Vesk P, Fidler F, Abbey-Lee R, Abbott J, Aguirre L, Alcaraz C, et al. (2023) .
https://doi.org/10.32942/X2GG62

Anonymous said on 10.11., 12:40

Protzko, J., Krosnick, J., Nelson, L. et al. High replicability of newly discovered social-behavioural findings is achievable. Nat Hum Behav (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-023-01749-9

Anonymous said on 04.10., 12:27

van Rooij, I., & Baggio, G. (2021). Theory before the test: How to build high-verisimilitude explanatory theories in psychological science. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 16(4) 682–697.

Anonymous said on 29.04., 13:47

Tenopir C., Allard S., Douglass K., Aydinoglu A. U., Wu L., Read E., . . . Frame M. (2011). Data sharing by scientists: Practices and perceptions. PLOS ONE, 6(6), Article e21101.

Anonymous said on 04.07., 12:59

Bak-Coleman, J., Devezer, B. Claims about scientific rigour require rigour. Nat Hum Behav 8, 1890–1891 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-024-01982-w

Anonymous said on 04.07., 13:02

Korbmacher, M., Azevedo, F., Pennington, C.R. et al. The replication crisis has led to positive structural, procedural, and community changes. Commun Psychol 1, 3 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s44271-023-00003-2

Anonymous said on 18.07., 16:31

Laurinavichyute et al. (2022): Share the code, not just the data: A case study of the reproducibility of articles published in the Journal of Memory and Language under the open data policy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2022.104332.

Anonymous said on 06.08., 12:43

Sterling et al. (2025): Investigating researcher perceptions of Questionable Research Practices. Journal of Second Language Studies. https://doi.org/10.1075/jsls.00048.ste