TUD
...
Fakultät Informatik
Professur Datenschutz und Datensicherheit
DuD-Poll Home
burst
Home
Poll
History
Edit Columns
Invite Participants
Access Control
Overview
Delete Poll
Customize
burst
This is a Normal poll.
Name
No Sort
▾▴
Last edit
Sort
▴
Total
Comments
Sort newest comment first
▴
Go to last comment
⇩
Anonymous said on 08.05., 09:11
Rubin, M. (2023). Questionable Metascience Practices. Journal of Trial and Error. https://journal.trialanderror.org/pub/questionable-metascience-practices/release/3
Anonymous said on 08.05., 09:11
Meehl, P. E. (1967). Theory-testing in psychology and physics: A methodological paradox. Philosophy of science, 34(2), 103-115. https://media.pluto.psy.uconn.edu/Meehl%201967.pdf
Anonymous said on 08.05., 09:12
Liberman, M. (2015). Reproducible research and the common task method. Simmons Foundation Lecture. https://www.simonsfoundation.org/event/reproducible-research-and-the-common-task-method/
Anonymous said on 25.05., 09:45
Feynman, R. P. (1974). Cargo cult science. https://calteches.library.caltech.edu/3043/1/CargoCult.pdf
Anonymous said on 13.07., 16:26
https://rpt-rl.netlify.app/
1 What is a theory? Fried, E. I. (2020). Theories and models: What they are, what they are for, and what they are about. Psychological Inquiry, 31(4), 336-344. https://doi.org/10.1080/1047840X.2020.1854011
2 Does psychology have a theory problem? Meehl, P. E. (1978). Theoretical Risks and Tabular Asterisks: Sir Karl, Sir Ronald, and the Slow Progress of Soft Psychology. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 1978, Vol. 46, 806-834. https://www3.nd.edu/~ghaeffel/Meehl(1978).pdf
3 Does psychology have a theory problem? Klein, S. B. (2014). What can recent replication failures tell us about the theoretical commitments of psychology?. Theory & Psychology, 24(3), 326-338. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354314529616
4 Does psychology have a theory problem? Scheel, A. M., Tiokhin, L., Isager, P. M., & Lakens, D. (2021). Why hypothesis testers should spend less time testing hypotheses. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 16(4), 744-755. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691620966795
5 How to improve psychological theory Borsboom, D., van der Maas, H. L., Dalege, J., Kievit, R. A., & Haig, B. D. (2021). Theory construction methodology: A practical framework for building theories in psychology. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 16(4), 756-766. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691620969647
6 How to improve psychological theory Guest, O., & Martin, A. E. (2021). How computational modeling can force theory building in psychological science. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 16(4), 789-802. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691620970585
7 How to improve psychological theory Maatman, F. O. (2021). Psychology's Theory Crisis, and Why Formal Modelling Cannot Solve It. https://psyarxiv.com/puqvs/
8 Taking steps to improve psychological theory Flake, J. K., & Fried, E. I. (2020). Measurement schmeasurement: Questionable measurement practices and how to avoid them. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 3(4), 456-465. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245920952393
9 Taking steps to improve psychological theory van Rooij, I., & Blokpoel, M. (2020). Formalizing verbal theories: A tutorial by dialogue. Social Psychology, 51(5), 285. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000428
10 Are we ready to test our theories? Oberauer, K., & Lewandowsky, S. (2019). Addressing the theory crisis in psychology. Psychonomic bulletin & review, 26(5), 1596-1618. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-019-01645-2
Anonymous said on 17.07., 13:48
Szollosi, A., & Donkin, C. (2021). Arrested theory development: The misguided distinction between exploratory and confirmatory research. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 16(4), 717-724.
Anonymous said on 18.07., 15:13
Muthukrishna, M., & Henrich, J. (2019). A problem in theory. Nature Human Behaviour, 3(3), 221-229.
Anonymous said on 28.07., 14:33
Using Large Language Models to Simulate Multiple Humans and Replicate Human Subject Studies
Gati Aher, Rosa I. Arriaga, Adam Tauman Kalai
https://arxiv.org/abs/2208.10264
Anonymous said on 19.10., 09:22
Same data, different analysts: variation in effect sizes due to analytical decisions in ecology and evolutionary biology
Gould E, Fraser H, Parker T, Nakagawa S, Griffith S, Vesk P, Fidler F, Abbey-Lee R, Abbott J, Aguirre L, Alcaraz C, et al. (2023) .
https://doi.org/10.32942/X2GG62
Anonymous said on 10.11., 12:40
Protzko, J., Krosnick, J., Nelson, L. et al. High replicability of newly discovered social-behavioural findings is achievable. Nat Hum Behav (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-023-01749-9
Anonymous said on 04.10., 12:18
What Makes a Good Theory, and How Do We Make a Theory Good?
Anonymous said on 04.10., 12:27
van Rooij, I., & Baggio, G. (2021). Theory before the test: How to build high-verisimilitude explanatory theories in psychological science. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 16(4) 682–697.
Go up
⇧
Your name:
says
Español
English
اَلْعَرَبِيَّة
Português brasileiro
русский
Deutsch
Italiano
Türkçe
Français
Polski
Español Argentino
Nederlands
Kiswahili
Magyar
Svenska
Česky
български
Dansk
Finnish
עִבְרִית
Norsk
Català
Galego
Eesti
Esperanto
Comments Sort newest comment first▴ Go to last comment⇩
Go up⇧